The early vaccines (blue line) were rolled out to the most vulnerable people in society who were more likely to have side effects. Secondly, more side effects were likely to be reported, indeed, had to be, early in the vaccination campaign and once these were established were far less likely to be reported for later batches.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

John goes on to declare that if he knew the vaccines were going to have that many side effects he would not have had them, a direct contradiction of what he said in the past about acceptable levels of vaccine adverse effects. He wonders, as usual, why the ‘establishment’ don’t own up to this scandal. This really is the pits.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sour grapes<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Hilariously, JC\u2019s video ends by running through all the editors who would not touch the letter with a bargepole. These are the world\u2019s top journals who reject about 95% of submissions at the best of times.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One moan is that the editor of JAMA sent a rejection letter within two hours. I honesty think the letter was looked at put straight in the bin as it was clearly nonsense. Actually very efficient. End of story. It is a common thing now that low quality scientists moan about the ‘lack of debate’ which is actually the correct response to gibberish.<\/p>\n\n\n\n